Detail Archives    Discuss This Issue    Subscribe to The Detail Fingerprint News Archive       Search Past Details

G o o d   M o r n i n g !
via THE WEEKLY DETAIL
 
Monday, February 26, 2007

 
The purpose of the Detail is to help keep you informed of the current state of affairs in the latent print community, to provide an avenue to circulate original fingerprint-related articles, and to announce important events as they happen in our field.
_________________________________________
__________________________________________
Breaking NEWz you can UzE...
compiled by Jon Stimac

CSI Con-man Fools Judges ELECTRIC NEW PAPER, SINGAPORE Feb 24, 2007 ...more than 700 cases to be reviewed because he posed as forensic investigator...

Norfolk Accused's Prints 'found with body' THE AUSTRALIAN - Feb 19, 2007 ...fingerprints on a plastic sheet found with victim's body belonged to the man on trial for her murder...

Reaction to the Report  THE HERALD, UK - Feb 16, 2007 ...reaction to the 11-month Justice 1 committee inquiry of the Shirley McKie case...

Fingerprints Led Police to Assault Suspect JOURNAL TIMES ONLINE, WI - Feb 16, 2007 ...prints found in the school bathroom where a boy was sexually assaulted led police to a suspect...

__________________________________________
Recent CLPEX Posting Activity
Last Week's Board topics containing new posts
Moderated by Steve Everist and Pat Wertheim

Auger Spectroscopy
EmmaC Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:01 am

Justice1 member speaks out.
Daktari Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:51 pm

Justice 1 Reports
Daktari Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:35 pm

McKie Cops break silence?
Daktari Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:32 pm

Thank GOD for stupid crooks!
Cindy Rennie Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:43 pm

More Thoughts On Bias
Charles Parker Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:59 pm

Statistics and Misidentifications - The weeks Detail
Michele Triplett Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:19 am

RAM Dye Stain
Andrew Schriever Thu Feb 22, 2007 3:29 pm

Questionnaire
Wayne Reutzel Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:02 pm

Life Expectancy of Dye Stains and QC Checks
M.Snyder Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:18 am

Daubert Debate in MD
L.J.Steele Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:15 am

Kicking and screaming into the 21st century.
Cindy Rennie Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:56 am

Indanedione-Zinc formulations
Mike Fletcher Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:59 pm

(http://clpex.com/phpBB/viewforum.php?f=2)
 

 
UPDATES ON CLPEX.com


No major updates on the website this week.

_________________________________________
 

Last week

Cindy Rennie brought us notes on Daubert issues from the recent ABFDE conference.

This week

we look at a review on MXRF related to latent print examination.

_________________________________________
Excerpts from a term paper on Micro-X-Ray Fluorescence Techniques
by Genise Caruso

Purpose: Research and evaluate a novel [latent print development] method developed by University of California scientists.

The technique, known as micro-x-ray fluorescence, (MXRF) was introduced at the 229th national meeting of the American Chemical Society, in San Diego, on March 13, 2005. Claimed to be revolutionary for detecting fingerprints that are difficult to distinguish through conventional means, the process may conceivably promote further use of fingerprinting as a forensic investigational tool. (Bernstein, 2005)

Science Daily.com website was made in the class discussion area, and through this website I discovered micro-x-ray fluorescence technology was recently developed as a novel method for detecting fingerprints with great advantages over methods that are known.

I had much difficulty finding useful data about MXRF. The information I did come across all appeared to be duplicated from an article written as a direct result of the research presented at the 229th national meeting of the American Chemical Society, in March of 2005.

I sent an email directly to Mr. Christopher Worley, the lead scientist responsible for the research on micro-x-ray fluorescence used in fingerprint identification. If anyone could offer me the information I was seeking, he was the one. Discouraged, as I did not get a response right away, my patience paid off as he did finally reply and provide me with some very valuable information.

Five researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, led by analytic chemist, Christopher Worley, Ph.D. developed a new method using X-ray technology that may greatly reduce or eliminate [many existing latent print development] obstacles. Micro-x-ray fluorescence (MXRF) is a procedure that employs spectroscopy, shown in [the below] figure, and while spectroscopic technology, in general, isn’t new, this work was unique, as it appeared to be the only known study concerning the actual detection of fingerprints using MXRF. (Worley et al, 2006)



Bits of residue from things we touch, and human secretions like sweat, blood or saliva, all contain certain chemical components, such as sodium and potassium chloride. MXRF works by detecting fingerprints based on the chemical ingredients connected to the residue, rather than by visible contrast between the print and background, which isn’t always possible. MXRF exposes the chemical markers, displaying ridge patterns of prints, allowing a visible image to be “seen.” (Bernstein, 2005)

Saturating a specimen using a thin beam of X-rays is noninvasive and won’t alter or damage [latent] prints like dusting can. Moreover, since MXRF is based on detecting elements that are left from fingerprints and not the actual prints themselves, it has the ability to uncover evidence on those difficult to detect surfaces.

Worley and his associates succeeded in proving that using MXRF they were able to detect prints unlikely to be discovered under normal assessment methods. Of course this didn’t mean no limitations were found. MXRF has shortcomings. It can’t detect every known element, and some prints just don’t contain enough material to be identified even using this technology. The equipment is very big, must accommodate the sample size, and doesn’t offer capabilities at this time to analyze specimens on location, at the crime scene.

Before it can acquire certification for use in U.S. crime labs, more studies and work is necessary. Additional testing and fine-tuning is needed for commercial use, especially since the current cost is $175,000. If all goes well, Worley and his associates anticipate it could be available for use in fingerprint detection sometime within this decade. He said, “This process represents a valuable new tool for forensic investigators that could allow them to nondestructively detect prints on surfaces that might otherwise be undetected by conventional methods. It won’t replace traditional fingerprinting , but could provide a valuable complement to it.”

A Kevex Omicron instrument (now owned by Thermo Electron) was used to analyze a majority of the samples. An EDAX Eagle II XPL MXRF instrument was used to compare or supplement the Kevex Omicron MXRF images collected from several samples. The Eagle is available in two standard configurations: Eagle II and Eagle II XPL. This table illustrates the basic components for the Eagle II XPL. (EDAX, 2007)

Tube: 40 W X-ray tube (Mo or Rh)
Capillary Optics: X-ray Poly-capillary Lens (XPL) - 40 µm spot
Intensity is roughly 50 to 100 times that of 300 mm mono-capillary
Stage High Precision stage (3 to 5 µm)
Low Mag CCD 10x (B/W)
High Mag CCD 200 x (color)
Chamber: Standard large sample chamber:
Diameter: 330 mm (13.0") Depth: 350 mm (13.8")
Accepts samples up to 250 mm x 200 mm x 90 mm
Detector: 80mm Lithium-drifted Silicon crystal, liquid nitrogen cooled
Na to U simultaneous detection (Be window )
<155 eV resolution for MnKa @ 5000 CPS
<240 eV resolution for MnKa @ 100,000 CPS
Electronics: EDAX Data Acquisition Module (EDAM) III
High throughput digital pulse processor
Multi-DSP and SMT technology
PCI-bus based connection to CPU
Workstation: Windows NT-based workstation fully-integrated with EDAX Data Acquisition Module via PCI interface System configuration and calibration software, comprehensive qualitative and quantitative software, optional Line scan and Mapping


References

Bernstein, M. (2005). New fingerprint visualization method uses Xrays to reveal missing clues. EurekaAlert! Retrieved on January 23, 2007, from http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-03/acs-fv30805.php

CSI: X-Ray Fingerprints. (2006). Micro-x-ray fluorescence also provides spectroscopic information. Science Insider. Retrieved on January 31, 2007, from http://webster.aip.org/dbis/stories/2006/15248.html

EDAX. (2007). Hi-Tech Instruments. (HTI) Micro X-Rays Fluorescence System, Eagle. Retrieved on January 23, 2007, from http://www.htiweb.com/Product_Infor/mXRF/mXRF_Infro.htm

Jones, W.D. (2005). X-ray vision picks up clues to crimes. Spectrum. Retrieved on January 31, 2007, from http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/print/2672

Worley, C.G., Wiltshire, S.S., Miller, T.C., Havirilla, G.J., & Majidi, V. (2006). Detection of visible on latent fingerprints using micro-x-ray fluorescence elemental imaging. Journal of Forensic Sciences. Vol. 51, No. 1, Retrieved on January 31, 2007, from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com
 

_____________________________________________________________________
Feel free to pass The Detail along to other examiners.  This is a free newsletter FOR latent print examiners, BY latent print examiners. There are no copyrights on The Detail, and the website is open for all to visit.

If you have not yet signed up to receive the Weekly Detail in YOUR e-mail inbox, go ahead and join the list now so you don't miss out!  (To join this free e-mail newsletter, enter your name and e-mail address on the following page: http://www.clpex.com/Subscribe.htm  You will be sent a Confirmation e-mail... just click on the link in that e-mail, or paste it into an Internet Explorer address bar, and you are signed up!)  If you have problems receiving the Detail from a work e-mail address, there have been past issues with department e-mail filters considering the Detail as potential unsolicited e-mail.  Try subscribing from a home e-mail address or contact your IT department to allow e-mails from Topica.  Members may unsubscribe at any time.  If you have difficulties with the sign-up process or have been inadvertently removed from the list, e-mail me personally at kaseywertheim@aol.com and I will try to work things out.

Until next Monday morning, don't work too hard or too little.

Have a GREAT week!