Detail Archives    Discuss This Issue    Subscribe to The Detail Fingerprint News Archive       Search Past Details

G o o d   M o r n i n g !
via THE WEEKLY DETAIL
 
Monday, November 21, 2005

 
The purpose of the Detail is to help keep you informed of the current state of affairs in the latent print community, to provide an avenue to circulate original fingerprint-related articles, and to announce important events as they happen in our field.
_________________________________________
__________________________________________
Breaking NEWz you can UzE...
compiled by Jon Stimac

Fingerprints: Scientific Proof or Just a Matter of Opinion?   SUNDAY HERALD, UK  - Nov 20, 2005 ...head of Scottish Fingerprint Service argues that ID from prints is ‘judgement’ rather than fact...

Fingerprints 'clue to bomb hoaxer' DAILY TELEGRAPH, AUSTRALIA - Nov 16, 2005 ...a truck drivers fingerprints were found on three of the four phone boxes....

Fingerprint Expert Testifies in Murder  Trial BRADENTON HERALD, FL - Nov 15, 2005 ...no fingerprints? That doesn't mean the victim wasn't in the vehicle, says expert...

New Fingerprint System Aims to Prevent Jail Escapes   KANSAS.COM - Nov 15, 2005 ...when it is time for inmates to be released, their prints are scanned and compared to the prints on file...

__________________________________________
Recent CLPEX Posting Activity
Last Week's Board topics containing new posts

Fingerprint Dogma Final Exam
Dogma (formerly Guest) 2085 Sun Nov 20, 2005 8:55 pm

Scottish Fingerprint Service
Iain McKie 18 Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:38 am

Iraq jobs
Kathy Saviers 384 Sat Nov 19, 2005 11:33 pm

Order of Processing Firearms
L.J.Steele 531 Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:57 am

JPEG v. WSQ Digitized Fingerprints
Michael Cherry 655 Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:20 pm

Is Dogma (formerly Guest) Micheal Cherry?
cchampod 293 Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:49 pm

(Complex Standards) Major Case Prints
C. Coppock 48 Fri Nov 18, 2005 4:59 pm

printers
Neville Morris 218 Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:13 pm

AFIS Internet Conference
Tamie Burkart 90 Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:22 am

Clear Silicone Casting Materials
LPE 156 Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:14 pm

Trace metal detection test
RAE 45 Wed Nov 16, 2005 10:25 pm

Contextual information and identifications
Les Bush 233 Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:34 pm

Point Of View: Distortion vs Dissimilarities
Charles Parker 130 Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:07 pm

Certification HELP!
Yeti 110 Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:38 pm

Sworn or Civilian
psucsi 782 Wed Nov 16, 2005 12:27 am

Hmmmm....
g. 799 Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:10 am
Guest

kathyluvlife 157 Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:29 pm
kathyluvlife

(http://clpex.com/phpBB/viewforum.php?f=2)

UPDATES ON CLPEX.com

Updated the Detail Archives


_________________________________________

Last week

Joe Polski brought us the IAI Update, including good news on the results of the hard work of the CFSO.

This week

We review an article from the journal Spectroscopy, July 2005 regarding the use of X-ray fluorescence (MXRF) for latent print detection.
_________________________________________
End of the Spectrum

Revealing More than Meets the Eye Using MXRF

Researchers have developed a novel method that detects fingerprints through the salts that are excreted in sweat. Scientists from the University of California working at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL, Los Alamos, NM) have developed, through the use of micro-X-ray fluorescence (MXRF), a novel technique that detects fingerprints based upon the chemical elements — salts excreted in sweat — mainly present in fingerprint residue.

The MXRF technique, which is based upon elemental composition, detects the sodium, potassium, and chlorine elements in these salts, as well as many other elements, if they are present. These elements are detected as a function of their location on a surface, reportedly making it possible to see a fingerprint where the salts have been deposited in the patterns of fingerprints — the lines forensic scientists call friction ridges.

"It worked better than I would have guessed. I was afraid that the method's detection limits, typically parts-per-million levels, combined with loss in signal when restricting the X-ray beam to a small spot, would result in poor signal to noise and prevent the detection of trace levels of inorganic residue in fingerprints," explained Christopher Worley, a scientist at LANL, who ied the project. "While this was true for some prints that were examined, others appeared to contain enough residue to detect the print friction ridges." When using the MXRF technique, a microfocused X-ray beam irradiates the sample, and IMAGE COURTESY OF LANL X-rays are emitted from the irradiated spot.

The energies of the emitted X-rays correspond to the elements present in that spot, and the number of X-ray photons emitted correlates with the amount of that element present. Then, by moving the beam across the sample both horizontally and vertically, a two-dimensional image for a given element is collected depicting relative differences in concentration of that element dispersed across the surface. According to Worley, the time to acquire an image depends upon the amount of detectable material present in the fingerprint and the level of image pixel resolution desired.

"For the majority of prints examined with the instrumentation in our labs, a typical analysis time was 10 to 20 hours - depending on the sample," Worley said. "The image was collected in an automated fashion, however, so this was just the waiting time before an image was complete. With the development of an instrument specifically designed to analyze elements commonly found in prints, such as those in body salts, I can envision the acquisition time being reduced to a few hours or less, perhaps much less with improvements in detectorelectronics."

According to Worley, MXRF offers some advantages over traditiona! fingerprint techniques. First, MXRF does not require the application of powders, vapors, or chemicals, and uses a low power X-ray source, so it is nondestructive and does not alter the fingerprint. Because inorganic elements present in the print residue are detected by MXRF, the presence of certain elements could provide clues as to what an individual had been touching before leaving the fingerprint.

Also, salts left on a surface in the pattern of a fingerprint should remain on the surface and detectable by MXRF indefinitely if left undisturbed. Finally, prints on multicolored backgrounds potentially can be difficult to detect by traditional methods, but the background color is irrelevant with MXRF.

Despite these advantages, however, Worley stresses that he does not envision MXRF replacing those traditional fingerprint methods. "Dusting and chemical treatments will always be important in fingerprint detection. Dusting, in particular, is fast and easy to do at a crime scene," Worley said. "Traditional methods also detect organic constituents in fingerprints, but MXRF cannot detect the carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen present in organic compounds. I see MXRF complementing current methods rather than replacing them."

And while it may make its mark in forensics, in the future, MXRF also could be used in two other important applications: homeland security and child-abduction cases.

"Everyone has a unique fingerprint, and MXRF expands the ability to detect fingerprints in certain situations over current techniques," Worley said. "So I think this method could be useful in the detection of prints in terrorist-related cases.

"Children's prints are typically difficult to detect by conventional means after aging," he continued. "However, inorganic components found in saliva or certain foods that might be present on a child's finger and left in a fingerprint pattern should be detectable for much longer periods of time, perhaps for many years."

Joseph Walsh
Associate Editor, Spectroscopy
Spectroscopy, July 2005 www.spectroscopyonline.com

______________________________________________________________________
Feel free to pass The Detail along to other examiners.  This is a free newsletter FOR latent print examiners, BY latent print examiners. There are no copyrights on The Detail (except in unique cases such as this week's article), and the website is open for all to visit.  FAIR USE NOTICE: This newsletter contains copyrighted material from the public domain, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.  www.clpex.com makes such material available in an effort to advance scientific understanding in the field of latent prints, thus constituting a 'fair use' of copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.  In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is displayed without profit to those who wish to view this information for research and/or educational purposes.  If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

If you have not yet signed up to receive the Weekly Detail in YOUR e-mail inbox, go ahead and join the list now so you don't miss out!  (To join this free e-mail newsletter, enter your name and e-mail address on the following page: http://www.clpex.com/Subscribe.htm  You will be sent a Confirmation e-mail... just click on the link in that e-mail, and you are signed up!)  If you have problems receiving the Detail from a work e-mail address, there have been past issues with department e-mail filters considering the Detail as potential unsolicited e-mail.  Try subscribing from a home e-mail address or contact your IT department to allow e-mails from Topica.  Members may unsubscribe at any time.  If you have difficulties with the sign-up process or have been inadvertently removed from the list, e-mail me personally at kaseywertheim@aol.com and I will try to work things out.


Until next Monday morning, don't work too hard or too little.

Have a GREAT week!