The Detail Archives    Discuss This Issue    Subscribe to The Detail

Fingerprint News Archive       Search Past Details

G o o d   M o r n i n g !
via THE WEEKLY DETAIL
 
Monday, May 30, 2005


The purpose of the Detail is to help keep you informed of the current state of affairs in the latent print community, to provide an avenue to circulate original fingerprint-related articles, and to announce important events as they happen in our field.
 

__________________________________________
Breaking NEWz you can UzE...
compiled by Jon Stimac
 

Nature's Barcode JOURNAL TIMES ONLINE, WI  - May 27, 2005 ...your fingerprints are increasingly being used for more than
identification...

Extra Digits MEDFORD MAIL TRIBUNE, OR - May 25, 2005 ...Oregon infant has been the center of attention with his 12 fingers and 14 toes...

Seized Drug $$ Used on Backlog of Fingerprints   BOSTON HERALD, MA - May 25, 2005 ...Boston PD has used $187,000 earmarked for drug programs to process a backlog of fingerprint evidence...

Australian Fingerprint Experts Axed   BENDIGO ADVERTISER, AUSTRALIA  - May 23, 2005  ...plans to scrap a major crime-solving service in Bendigo would hamper police investigations...

(Distrubuted Tuesday, May 31 after the U.S. Memorial Day Weekend

___________________________________
Last week, we thought about what happens when a splinter is allowed to fester.

This week Iain McKie responds to that and we consider Memorial Day.
___________________________________
The Real Debate

In his ‘Weekly Detail’ on www.clpex.com Kasey Wertheim raises an issue of supreme importance to the profession of fingerprinting.

He reflects on what happens when a splinter is allowed to fester. The splinters in question are the unresolved disputes about the ‘Shirley McKie’ and ‘Marion Ross’ ‘identificationsclaimed by SCRO and Peter Swann.

Kasey says, “It is past time to remove this splinter from the latent print discipline.” But how ?

As I have observed in the past the real danger in this whole affair is that by failing to face the issues square on your profession stands to be split wide open by disputes like this.

It can be argued that the reluctance of the Fingerprint Society and the IAI to create more of a worldwide

consensus among experts has allowed the splinter to fester to a stage where it now represents a serious threat to fingerprinting.

The danger is that you allow the smokescreen, currently being deployed to protect the reputation of the few, to obscure the fact that the overwhelming body of evidence from

Shirley’s trial and the HMCI’s independent enquiry to the statement by 171 world experts and the major police enquiry – points to SCRO and their supporters being wrong. That this smokescreen threatens your profession far more than Shirley is self evident.

As I have already stated the facts of the Shirley McKie and Marion Ross ‘identifications cannot be changed and will be evaluated in the Court of Session next year. The problem for your profession is how to prevent your critics climbing on the bandwagon so conveniently offered them over the past two weeks.

Kasey observes, “In reality, the heart of the issue is the concept of "sides" concerning a particular latent print comparison. There should be no "sides" regarding the identity versus the nonidentity of any pair of impressions except for truth. When an element of mistruth exists, as it must in any case of opposing conclusions, it becomes a splinter in the greater body of worldwide forensic science that must be dealt with.”

My case is that the truth is there for everyone to see if they choose to see it. That others see it differently is fine by me but not I suspect for a forensic science already under pressure from so many quarters.

Kasey Wertheim is right doing nothing is not an option. I will cooperate fully in any coherent action to remove these splinters be that by independent enquiry, debate or whatever. Do nothing and I fear you will give your critics yet more opportunity to attack fingerprinting as a forensic science and devalue a valuable crime detection and prevention resource.

Iain McKie

31 May 2005
www.shirleymckie.com
______________________________________________________________________
Remember, the message board is always open: (http://www.clpex.com/phpBB/viewforum.php?f=2).  For more formal latent print discussions, visit onin.com: (http://www.onin.com)


______________________________________________________________________
UPDATES ON CLPEX.com


No major updates on the website this week.

______________________________________________________________________
Feel free to pass The Detail along to other examiners.  This is a free newsletter FOR latent print examiners, BY latent print examiners. There are no copyrights on The Detail, and the website is open for all to visit.

If you have not yet signed up to receive the Weekly Detail in YOUR e-mail inbox, go ahead and join the list now so you don't miss out!  (To join this free e-mail newsletter, send a blank e-mail to: theweeklydetail-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com)  Members may unsubscribe at any time.  If you have difficulties with the sign-up process or have been inadvertently removed from the list, e-mail me personally at kaseywertheim@aol.com and I will try to work things out.

Until next Monday morning, don't work too hard or too little.

Have a GREAT week!