The Detail Archives    Discuss This Issue    Subscribe to The Detail

Fingerprint News Archive       Search Past Details

G o o d   M o r n i n g !
via THE WEEKLY DETAIL
 
Monday, August 23, 2004

The purpose of the Detail is to help keep you informed of the current state of affairs in the latent print community, to provide an avenue to circulate original fingerprint-related articles, and to announce important events as they happen in our field.

Breaking NEWz you can UzE...
compiled by Jon Stimac
 

Fingerprint System Nails 10,700 Crossers with Records   TUCSON CITIZEN, AZ  - Aug. 20, 2004 ...AFIS has helped Border Patrol agents apprehend illegal immigrants with criminal or immigration records...

Fingerprinting System Puts Prints in State Database   BAY CITY TIMES, MI - Aug. 19, 2004 ...an updated fingerprinting system soon will help county sheriff's deputies better identify criminals...

Police Test Handheld Fingerprint Reader GLOBALTECHNOLOGY.COM - Aug. 18, 2004 ...handheld device scans a suspect's fingerprint and checks it against Minnesota's  fingerprint database...

Palm Print of Sex Offender Doesn't Match MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE, MN  - Aug. 17, 2004 ...a palm print of a convict questioned in the disappearance of a missing TV anchorwoman doesn't match those found at the scene...

Last week
Dennis Degler prompted a discussion on the CLPEX message forum regarding John Doe warrants.

This week

the IAI is in full swing in St. Louis, MO. and an excellent program is ahead of those in attendance.

___________________________________
This week, we review an article on:

Process errors leading to missed Identifications

Recognizing the potential for error is the first step in eliminating it. The possible causes of missed-ID's has been studied. A comprehensive list of mistakes should be compiled that includes oversights, errors, omissions etc that could lead to a suspect not being identified in a case where a detectable latent print capable of individualization was present.

Below is a list of all the ones I could think of, grouped by which stage of the process at which they occur.

I'd like people to comment on whether they think the errors are caused by lack of proficiency on the part of the operator, by unsound judgment by the decision-maker or are unavoidable in some or all circumstances. Also, can you think of any errors I have missed?

Evidence recovery

The scene is not examined by a CSI

A surface that bears a detectable latent print is not examined

The surface is not examined using the appropriate method for development of the latent

The latent is not optimally developed

The developed latent is not noticed by the CSI

The developed latent print is not recognized as a friction ridge print

The developed latent print is not recorded or recovered

 

Analysis

The latent is incorrectly assessed as containing insufficient detail for individualization

Features of the latent are incorrectly classified as friction ridge features or as distortion artifacts

The latent is orientated incorrectly

The digit/palmar determination and search allowances do not include the correct location for the friction ridge skin

 

Comparison

The corresponding exemplar is not compared with the latent

The selected target(s) from the latent is (are) not present in the exemplar

The target group is not recognized when seen in the exemplar

Incomplete comparison of all the features available

 

Evaluation

Under-evaluation of similarities

Over-evaluation of dissimilarities
_______________________________________________________

To discuss this Detail, the message board is always open: (http://www.clpex.com/phpBB/viewforum.php?f=2)

More formal latent print discussions are available at onin.com: (http://www.onin.com)


_______________________________________________________

FUNNY FINGERPRINT FIND
The Detail was sent out this week during discussions regarding all sorts of interesting fingerprint-related topics by 5 crazy examiners part 2.


_______________________________________________________

UPDATES ON CLPEX.com


Updated the Detail Archives

Updated the Newzroom


_______________________________________________________

Feel free to pass The Detail along to other examiners.  This is a free newsletter FOR latent print examiners, BY latent print examiners. There are no copyrights on The Detail, and the website is open for all to visit.

If you have not yet signed up to receive the Weekly Detail in YOUR e-mail inbox, go ahead and join the list now so you don't miss out!  (To join this free e-mail newsletter, send a blank e-mail to: theweeklydetail-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com)  Members may unsubscribe at any time.  If you have difficulties with the sign-up process or have been inadvertently removed from the list, e-mail me personally at kaseywertheim@aol.com and I will try to work things out.

Until next Monday morning, don't work too hard or too little.

Have a GREAT week!