T H E
P L A Z A C A S E
Jan 7, 2002 Judge Pollak rules against fingerprint testimony in a 49 page decision (PDF) Jan
9
"Experts May No Longer Testify
That Fingerprints 'Match'" Jan 10 The ruling was reported by the Associated Press Jan
11 "All things Considered" Jan
11 "Judge
Rules Fingerprints Cannot be Called a Match" Jan
11 The ruling
was again reported by the Associated
Press Jan 13 Articles appear in several Sunday papers across the country. Jan
14 "The
Reliability of Fingerprint Identification" Jan
14 "Scientific
Method?" Jan 17 Government's Motion for Reconsideration Jan
27 "Ruling
on Fingerprints Causes Stir" Jan 28 Gov's Memorandum In Support of Reconsideration
Pre-reconsideration decision news articles: Feb 25
"Fingerprint
Evidence Faces New Test" Feb 25
"Fingerprints
Challenged in Court" Feb 25
"Fingerprints
Face Legal Challenge" Feb 25
"Fingerprint
Evidence Put on Trial"
Feb 26 "Prosecutors
Seek Reconsideration of Landmark Fingerprint Ruling" Feb
26
"Print
Evidence Reliable, says U.S." Feb
26 "Pointing
a Finger at Prints" Feb 27
"Expert:
FBI Fingerprint Test Easy" Feb 27
"Print
Expert Says FBI Test is Laughable" Feb 27
"Expert
Testifies on FBI Fingerprints" Feb 27
"FBI
Fingerprint Standards Criticized" Feb 28
"Judge
Mulls Testimony of Fingerprints" March
13 "Judge
Pollak's Reconsideration Ruling" March
13 "Judge
Allows Fingerprint Analysis" March 14
"Judge
To Allow Fingerprint Testimony" March 20
"As
the Whorl Turns"
|
|
|