Breaking NEWz you can UzE...
FBI confirms Gerhartsreiter’s identity
Boston Herald, United States - Aug 15, 2008
Investigators used a total of four fingerprints - one recently taken from a wine glass in Boston, two from his recent police booking in Baltimore and Boston ...
Bad Science in Court
New York Times Blogs, NY - Aug 14, 2008
A 2006 UK study by researchers at the University of Southampton found that the error rate of fingerprint analysts doubled when they were first told the ...
Recent CLPEX Posting Activity
containing new posts
Moderated by Steve Everist and Charlie Parker
Moderated by Steve Everist
Disagreements between experts
by supersleuth on Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:43 am 6 Replies 208 Views Last
post by RL Tavernaro
on Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:56 am
Evidence Fabrication in South Africa
1 ... 16, 17, 18by Pat A. Wertheim on Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:48 pm 263
Replies 30365 Views Last post by Pat A. Wertheim
on Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:36 am
Is Peter Swann A Qualified Fingerprint Expert
by Big Wullie on Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:28 pm 10 Replies 519 Views Last
post by Big Wullie
on Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:30 pm
Calls for Inquiry to be scrapped
1 ... 30, 31, 32by Daktari on Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:28 am 470 Replies
40639 Views Last post by Big Wullie
on Fri Aug 15, 2008 12:05 am
by Kathleen Birnbaum on Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:18 pm 1 Replies 150
Views Last post by Boyd Baumgartner
on Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:14 am
Job opening in NH
by Lisa Corson on Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:24 am 3 Replies 323 Views Last
post by Emily E Rice
on Thu Aug 14, 2008 8:19 am
by Michele on Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:39 am 5 Replies 250 Views Last post
by Kathleen Birnbaum
on Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:30 pm
Forensic Science in Need of Reform
by Ann Horsman on Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:12 am 4 Replies 203 Views Last
post by Ann Horsman
on Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:37 pm
by supersleuth on Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:59 am 2 Replies 192 Views Last
post by Gerald Clough
on Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:11 am
IAI Certification (Detail Newz)
by David Fairhurst on Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:26 am 5 Replies 329 Views
Last post by David Fairhurst
on Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:18 am
UK Experts Are Better Trained Than Americans
by Big Wullie on Fri Aug 08, 2008 4:58 pm 8 Replies 459 Views Last
post by Big Wullie
on Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:44 pm
Mass Examiner to testify about prints on firearms
by L.J.Steele on Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:22 am 11 Replies 476 Views Last
post by mgirard
on Tue Aug 12, 2008 1:21 pm
Latent Print Exam and Forensic Tech Positions - CONUS/OCONUS
by wkpetroka on Tue Apr 15, 2008 1:31 pm 2 Replies 897 Views Last
post by wkpetroka
on Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:32 am
Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Louisana
by Charles Parker on Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:37 pm 0 Replies 161 Views
Last post by Charles Parker
on Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:37 pm
IAI Conference Topics -
Louisville, Kentucky 2008:
Moderator: Steve Everist
No new posts
Documentation issues as they apply to latent prints
Moderator: Charles Parker
No new posts
Historical topics related to latent print examination
Moderator: Charles Parker
by Boyd Baumgartner on Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:03 am 0 Replies 16 Views
Last post by Boyd Baumgartner
on Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:03 am
Early fingerprint enhancement
by gerritvolckeryck on Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:13 pm 3 Replies 65 Views
Last post by gerritvolckeryck
on Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:07 am
Updated the Fingerprint Interest Group (FIG) page
with FIG #58; Movement; submitted by
B. Manno. You can send your example of unique distortion to
For discussion, visit the CLPEX.com forum FIG thread.
Updated the forum Keeping Examiners Prepared for
thread with KEPT #32; Blind Verification - What is it?
by Michelle Triplett. You can send your
questions on courtroom topics to Michelle Triplett:
Updated the Smiley Files with 2 new smileys, submitted by Lora Cornell of
Ideal Innovations Inc. You can send your smileys to the Smiley Czar, Bill Wolz
Updated the Detail Archives
George Reis brought us a look at forensic digital image asset management.
Thanks to all that offered feedback to George, and if you have not yet done
so but would like to, George can still be reached over the next few weeks
regarding your feedback on this topic.
we look at the latest version of the Department of Defense, Biometrics Task
Force "Biometric Scan" newsletter, portions of which mention latent prints
or latent print related projects.
DoD BTF Biometric Scan - Enduring
Capabilities; Experimentation, Cutting-Edge Events, and Research Awards
by Dr. Myra Gray, BTF
Director, and Editorial Staff
It’s an exciting time to be in the biometrics field.
This issue of The Scan reports on several recent achievements toward Unity
of Effort among government agencies, industry, and academia to bring
cohesion within this enabling technology. Recently, the BTF hosted the "Next
Generation Biometrics" Warfare Analysis Laboratory Exercise, where we met
with leading innovators from industry and academia to consider technology in
the future. We are also helping sponsor the Tactical Network Topology
events, which test emerging technologies and find solutions.
Our lead story covers the first-ever DoD Biometrics Enterprise Strategic
Plan, which helps articulate and direct how the BTF supports the overall
Department of Defense Enterprise solution for biometrics. As you can see
from our link to the new Presidential directive, biometrics plays a major
role in the security of our nation and requires unity of effort. In the Q&A
section, read how BTF Standards are leading those needs.
Finally, we have reports in from the updated Broad Agency Announcement and
Biometric Technology Demonstration releases, and news from TRADOC on its
progress in writing requirements that will allow biometrics to become a
formal program of record.
I often say, as the Director of the Biometrics Task Force, I am a glorified
cat-herder among disparate collectors of biometrics. At times like these,
when we all seem to be heading in the same direction and showing great
results, the job is more than enjoyable, it is richly rewarding. I hope you
are enjoying your work as well.
Dr. Myra S. Gray, SES
Director, Biometrics Task Force
TNT Sets Off Long-Range Experiments
Biometrics playing a larger role in Tactical Network Topology joint
experimentation venue that spans three locations . . .
Stepping into a new role as co-sponsor, the Biometrics Task Force has joined
the Naval Post-graduate School of Monterey, Ca., in hosting the U.S. Special
Operations Command quarterly cooperative field experiment venue known as
Tactical Network Topology. TNT is a simultaneous demonstration of new
technologies between three locations: Camp Dawson, W.Va., Camp Roberts, Ca.,
and Camp Atterbury, IN.
TNT provides an experimentation venue to support the near-term needs of the
warfighter by evaluating and improving biometric capabilities and
communication architectures used to collect, store, and transmit biometric
data. The series of quarterly field experiments is currently focused on
technologies bridging the information gap in the “Last Tactical Mile,”
headquarters to tactical units in remote locations. Future experiments will
build upon the lessons from the “Last Tactical Mile” experiments to develop
new biometrics activities, some of which will be created by the BTF
Concepts & Technologies (C&T) Branch for inclusion in TNT.
The roots of the current TNT cooperative field experimentation program began
in 2002 when the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) conducted experiments in a
field environment to assess various technologies and concepts being used at
the NPS. Joint experimentation began when SOCOM personnel visited the NPS to
leverage the faculty and its student expertise. SOCOM and the NPS combined
efforts, which eventually led to the creation of the TNT venue. BTF
involvement began in May of 2005, according to Jon Hayes, TNT’s biometrics
project manager and part of the C&T Branch. Hayes executes TNT experiments
at Camp Dawson and leads engineering projects related to TNT biometric
experimentation. His work at the BTF allows him to interface with various
vendors and technologies to identify and evaluate new biometrics activities
and initiatives for inclusion in TNT.
The BTF began hosting TNT experiments from Camp Dawson a year ago, focusing
on biometrics and supporting technologies. The C&T and the Technology
Assessment and Standards Conformance (TASC) Branches have participated in
TNT to support concept development, conduct technology assessments, and
identify tactical capabilities and limitations in Special Operations Forces
(SOF) biometric collection and matching processes as they exist today.
Dr. Gray and other members of the BTF leadership observed the May 08 TNT
event, which was the largest yet at Camp Dawson. The disparate locations
help test rapid identification efforts on wireless networks, unmanned or
autonomous vehicles, sensor networks, situational awareness, net-centric
applications, target tracking and identification, and biometric
identification and verification. Measures of performance for each of the
demonstrated technologies are collected by Special Operations Forces
operators, engineers and technicians. Requirements gaps and technical
shortfalls are then addressed and improvements are made for the next
Experimentation has included biometric technologies that: enable the
collection of multimodal biometric data (face and iris) both covertly and
overtly and from a stand-off location, collect iris images and provide
location matching services, relate law enforcement tactics and systems to
military scenarios, enhance latent fingerprint image collections, and
showcase new and maturing biometric collection technologies. The next TNT
experiments will be August 17-22.
WALEX: Advancing Biometric Technology
The Biometrics Task Force and Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics
Laboratory Milton Eisenhower Research Center sponsored the "Next Generation
Biometrics" Warfare Analysis Laboratory Exercise at APL June 10-11.
This two-day event served to gather members of the intelligence, government,
and academic communities in a collaborative effort to meet the challenges of
remote, unconventional, non-cooperative, next generation biometrics within
As sponsors of the event, BTF Director Dr. Myra Gray welcomed the group to
the APL’s Warfare Analysis Laboratory (WAL) and shared her aspirations for
the event to do more than identify the best biometric solutions for remote
human identification, saying, “What we are doing here today will make a
difference for the Global War on Terror.” Gray was followed by other leaders
in the biometrics community before the event began to evaluate biometric
technologies and their classified and unclassified applications in specific
The WAL facility is like a war simulation room with 53 work stations that
allow simultaneous electronic discussions. Information discussed within “the
WAL” is secure; however, BTF Latent Print Examiner Kasey Wertheim had some
general comments about the event. “Seeing the state-of-the-art technologies
being presented by the scientists who are actively working on them is a rare
treat in the biometric world.” Mr. Wertheim’s reference to scientists stems
from the cadre of seven PhD presenters over the course of the two-day
session. “Although specific capabilities are classified,” continued
Wertheim, “DoD is generally interested in the exploration of new biometric
modalities, capturing biometrics from moving subjects, and near-real-time
communication to systems from the field… and technology generally follows
the interests of government customers.”
BTF Selection Process Chooses Innovative Projects
As reported in the last issue of The Scan, the BTF is actively promoting the
identification and transition of biometric technology in the DoD by
soliciting proposals and selecting projects to fund for development. This
includes two Science & Technology-related initiatives: Biometric Technology
Demonstrations (BTD) – sponsored by the BTF, and Biometrics Broad Agency
Announcement (BAA) – sponsored by the Director, Defense Research &
We reported last quarter that 30 BTD project proposals had been considered.
Here is a list of the five selected for funding this fiscal year:
Communications-Electronics Research, Development, and Engineering Center
(CERDEC) Command and Control Directorate (C2D) will prototype and test its
Biometric Identification & Notification Services (BINS), to provide the
Warfighter with a means to analyze and verify biometric data captured in
theater, in near-real time;
Space Warfare Systems Center (SPAWARSYSCEN) Charleston will implement a
“Face Recognition at a Distance” capability to the existing Biometric Inmate
Tracking System (BITS) current in use at the Naval Consolidated Brig
Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) / U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) are
jointly sponsoring the development and testing of a DoD “Identity Enrollment
System”, to capture biometrics and identity documents, and to generate a
unique identifier for non-Common Access Card (CAC)-eligible personnel
Armament Research Engineering and Development Center (ARDEC), will build and
test an “Iris Recognition at Distance” system (3-6 meter range) in an
Army Research Office (ARO) will test and validate a Commercial-Off-The-Shelf
(COTS) “Interoperable Biometric Fusion Platform” technology for use with
large and disparate databases (using output data only), and establish a best
practices and framework for implementation.
Solicitations for the FY09 BTDs will take place in July and August 08.
The second initiative is the Biometrics Broad Agency Announcement (BAA). The
fiscal year 2008 Biometrics BAA specifically requested proposals for unique
and innovative research for biometric identification research. Of the 175
proposals, 10 have been selected for funding. Below are the organizations
that received an award and the title of their project:
Aoptix for “Development of an Advanced Hand-held Iris Biometric Imager
Brassboard and Demonstration”
Cross Match Technologies for “Multi-Biometric Fusion”
Digital Signal Corporation for “A Daytime/Nighttime Long Range
Multi-biometric System for Military Operations”
Noblis for “Multispectral Iris Fusion for Enhancement and Interoperability”
Flashscan3D LLC for a “Miniature, Non-contact, Rolled Equivalent Fingerprint
Collection Device using Structured Light Illumination”
Honeywell for “Acquiring High-Quality Iris Images from Moving Subjects with
a Fluttering Shutter”
Sarnoff Corporation for “High Speed Iris Biometric Capture”
Scitor for a “Novel Long Range Illuminator”
Syntronics for a [ruggedized, hand-held] “Syntronics LatentMaster
University of Houston for “Face Recognition for Physical and Logical Access
Control: Demonstration and Assessment”
The BAA is intended to remain open for two years to allow for additional
efforts as funding permits. Solicitations for the FY09 Biometrics BAA are
scheduled to begin this September.
Also noteworthy is the development of a Biometrics S&T Strategy, an ongoing
effort being sponsored by the Director, Defense Biometrics. MITRE
Corporation is working with the BTF and the service S&T organizations to
develop the S&T Strategy, which will fall within the umbrella of the DoD
Biometrics Enterprise Strategy. Once complete, the BTF will begin
development of the Biometrics S&T Plan and S&T Roadmap, also in conjunction
with the services and agencies within DoD. Together, these documents will
provide guidance to the DoD S&T community that will shape biometric S&T
efforts and provide our warfighters and business users with the future
capabilities they require to meet their mission.
- Keeping Examiners Prepared for Testimony - #32
Blind Verification - What is it?
by Michele Triplett, King County
The intent of this is to provide thought provoking discussion.
No claims of accuracy exist.
What is Blind Verification?
Blind verification is a method of reviewing a case,
or a conclusion in a case, for reliability.
Blind verification is a re-examination of a case or
a conclusion in a case by another person who doesn’t know the results of the
first examination. To do a
proper blind verification the verifier should have the same or equivalent
information that the original examiner had.
Blind verification is the ultimate way to validate
Blind verification is method of testing a potential
conclusion for reproducibility (reliability)?
Blind verification isn’t the review of what’s been done in the case
because the blind reviewer isn’t given any information to review.
Blind verification is a re-examination if the person doing the blind
verification has the same or equivalent information that the original
examiner had. If they don’t
have the same or equivalent information then it may be considered a new
examination instead of a re-examination.
Blind verification tests the reliability of a conclusion (the
reproducibility) but it doesn’t look at how the conclusion was arrived at
(the validity of the conclusion).
Another topic for discussion regarding this answer is the use of the
term ‘identification’ vs. using the term ‘individualization’ (but that’s a
topic for another discussion).
Blind verification is a new concept to the latent print community but
it’s common in other scientific disciplines.
Many disciplines refer to it as blind testing.
Feel free to pass The Detail along to other
examiners. This is a free newsletter FOR latent print examiners, BY
latent print examiners.
With the exception of weeks such as this week, there
are no copyrights on The Detail content. As always, the website is
open for all to visit!
If you have not yet signed up to receive the
Weekly Detail in YOUR e-mail inbox, go ahead and
join the list now so you don't miss out! (To join this free e-mail
newsletter, enter your name and e-mail address on the following page:
You will be sent a Confirmation e-mail... just click on the link in that
e-mail, or paste it into an Internet Explorer address bar, and you are
signed up!) If you have problems receiving the Detail from a work
e-mail address, there have been past issues with department e-mail filters
considering the Detail as potential unsolicited e-mail. Try
subscribing from a home e-mail address or contact your IT department to
allow e-mails from Topica. Members may unsubscribe at any time.
If you have difficulties with the sign-up process or have been inadvertently
removed from the list, e-mail me personally at
email@example.com and I will try
to work things out.
Until next Monday morning, don't work too hard or too little.
Have a GREAT week!